<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ORLY?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.the-gatekeeper.net/orly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.the-gatekeeper.net/orly/</link>
	<description>My little slice of the &#039;net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:44:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gatekeepeR</title>
		<link>http://www.the-gatekeeper.net/orly/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>gatekeepeR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-gatekeeper.net/?p=18#comment-9</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re not in Verizon&#039;s footprint (stupid franchising laws), but I would LOVE to have it.  But from the U-verse description and pricing in other markets, it&#039;s about the same as FiOS.  

Part of the issue for us, is that we&#039;re in the old Bellsouth region, which had exclusive rights prior to the merger with AT&amp;T.  U-verse was implemented prior to the purchase, so that&#039;s why NC&#039;s been lagging behind.  Charlotte and Raleigh already have U-verse running, and I&#039;ve seen posts about the nodes going in over in Winston-Salem (30 miles from my house) last year.  

U-verse, even though it&#039;s fiber to the node, then copper to the house, looks like it&#039;s starting to get to Fiber to the house, which may be what I get when it&#039;s active in Greensboro.  No telling though, as I haven&#039;t seen any boxes beind put up on my end of town.  Granted, I don&#039;t get out much other than work and school.  

The 1-1.5Mbps up is what I&#039;m really killing for.  With TW, I&#039;m capped at 384kbps up, and lucky to see 300kbps on most occassions (more like 250-ish).  I&#039;m anxious to see how DSL fares, since it&#039;s capped at 512k up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re not in Verizon&#8217;s footprint (stupid franchising laws), but I would LOVE to have it.  But from the U-verse description and pricing in other markets, it&#8217;s about the same as FiOS.  </p>
<p>Part of the issue for us, is that we&#8217;re in the old Bellsouth region, which had exclusive rights prior to the merger with AT&amp;T.  U-verse was implemented prior to the purchase, so that&#8217;s why NC&#8217;s been lagging behind.  Charlotte and Raleigh already have U-verse running, and I&#8217;ve seen posts about the nodes going in over in Winston-Salem (30 miles from my house) last year.  </p>
<p>U-verse, even though it&#8217;s fiber to the node, then copper to the house, looks like it&#8217;s starting to get to Fiber to the house, which may be what I get when it&#8217;s active in Greensboro.  No telling though, as I haven&#8217;t seen any boxes beind put up on my end of town.  Granted, I don&#8217;t get out much other than work and school.  </p>
<p>The 1-1.5Mbps up is what I&#8217;m really killing for.  With TW, I&#8217;m capped at 384kbps up, and lucky to see 300kbps on most occassions (more like 250-ish).  I&#8217;m anxious to see how DSL fares, since it&#8217;s capped at 512k up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Native</title>
		<link>http://www.the-gatekeeper.net/orly/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Native</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-gatekeeper.net/?p=18#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a big fan of u-verse.. but I really rrrrrrreally want FIOS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_FiOS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a big fan of u-verse.. but I really rrrrrrreally want FIOS <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_FiOS" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_FiOS</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gatekeepeR</title>
		<link>http://www.the-gatekeeper.net/orly/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>gatekeepeR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 21:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-gatekeeper.net/?p=18#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Yep, these are the new digs.  Haven&#039;t done too much to it yet.  At least now I can x-post to LJ and keep everyone up to date.  Unfortunately, doesn&#039;t work with the other stuff, like dreamwidth.

U-verse is like FIOS.  High speed, cable over the phone line stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, these are the new digs.  Haven&#8217;t done too much to it yet.  At least now I can x-post to LJ and keep everyone up to date.  Unfortunately, doesn&#8217;t work with the other stuff, like dreamwidth.</p>
<p>U-verse is like FIOS.  High speed, cable over the phone line stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: girlspell</title>
		<link>http://www.the-gatekeeper.net/orly/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>girlspell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 19:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-gatekeeper.net/?p=18#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Hi

So this is your new digs?  Looks interesting.

I never heard of u-verse. Sounds interesting.  I just heard that Fios (finally) is coming to my neighborhood.  I&#039;m excited about them.  We had comcast (the local monopoly cable company for TV &amp; internet) got tired of them, switched to Verizon DSL.  Now Fios is coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>So this is your new digs?  Looks interesting.</p>
<p>I never heard of u-verse. Sounds interesting.  I just heard that Fios (finally) is coming to my neighborhood.  I&#8217;m excited about them.  We had comcast (the local monopoly cable company for TV &amp; internet) got tired of them, switched to Verizon DSL.  Now Fios is coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
